The fleet, year by year
Drag the slider or press play to watch nuclear capacity spread from 1951 to 2026. Each circle is a site, sized by the capacity it had online that year; a site vanishes when its last unit shuts down.
Biggest movers
Change in operating capacity over the last 10 years (2016 to 2026), from the same dates as the map above.
| Country | 2016 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 33.8 | 64.6 | +30.8 |
| United Arab Emirates | 0.0 | 5.7 | +5.7 |
| India | 5.3 | 8.4 | +3.1 |
| South Korea | 24.0 | 27.1 | +3.1 |
| Russia | 26.8 | 29.8 | +3.0 |
| Pakistan | 1.1 | 3.5 | +2.4 |
| Belarus | 0.0 | 2.4 | +2.4 |
| Finland | 2.9 | 4.6 | +1.7 |
| Country | 2016 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 11.4 | 0.0 | -11.4 |
| Japan | 20.3 | 14.6 | -5.7 |
| Taiwan | 5.1 | 0.0 | -5.1 |
| Belgium | 6.2 | 2.2 | -4.0 |
| United Kingdom | 10.4 | 6.5 | -3.8 |
| United States | 105.8 | 102.5 | -3.4 |
| Sweden | 9.5 | 7.2 | -2.4 |
| Canada | 14.6 | 13.5 | -1.1 |
GW gross. A gain here can be one large unit starting up rather than a broad build-out; see a country's own page for its detail.
World operating capacity
Data table
| Year | Units online | GW gross | Change, GW |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1951 | 1 | 0.00 | +0.00 |
| 1954 | 2 | 0.01 | +0.01 |
| 1955 | 3 | 0.06 | +0.05 |
| 1956 | 6 | 0.13 | +0.07 |
| 1957 | 9 | 0.21 | +0.09 |
| 1958 | 12 | 0.39 | +0.18 |
| 1959 | 17 | 0.68 | +0.28 |
| 1960 | 20 | 0.99 | +0.31 |
| 1961 | 23 | 1.35 | +0.36 |
| 1962 | 32 | 2.30 | +0.95 |
| 1963 | 37 | 2.57 | +0.26 |
| 1964 | 45 | 3.75 | +1.18 |
| 1965 | 57 | 5.93 | +2.18 |
| 1966 | 64 | 7.31 | +1.38 |
| 1967 | 66 | 8.07 | +0.76 |
| 1968 | 72 | 9.98 | +1.92 |
| 1969 | 83 | 13.14 | +3.15 |
| 1970 | 89 | 16.40 | +3.26 |
| 1971 | 99 | 23.38 | +6.98 |
| 1972 | 115 | 33.41 | +10.03 |
| 1973 | 127 | 42.09 | +8.68 |
| 1974 | 144 | 57.88 | +15.79 |
| 1975 | 167 | 75.14 | +17.26 |
| 1976 | 179 | 85.77 | +10.63 |
| 1977 | 190 | 98.62 | +12.86 |
| 1978 | 204 | 110.77 | +12.15 |
| 1979 | 222 | 125.76 | +14.99 |
| 1980 | 234 | 137.36 | +11.59 |
| 1981 | 258 | 158.79 | +21.44 |
| 1982 | 266 | 167.05 | +8.25 |
| 1983 | 286 | 185.99 | +18.94 |
| 1984 | 311 | 213.28 | +27.30 |
| 1985 | 349 | 254.88 | +41.60 |
| 1986 | 374 | 281.31 | +26.43 |
| 1987 | 391 | 302.83 | +21.52 |
| 1988 | 406 | 324.44 | +21.61 |
| 1989 | 418 | 338.37 | +13.93 |
| 1990 | 410 | 340.93 | +2.56 |
| 1991 | 407 | 343.01 | +2.08 |
| 1992 | 407 | 344.60 | +1.59 |
| 1993 | 414 | 351.16 | +6.56 |
| 1994 | 416 | 355.44 | +4.28 |
| 1995 | 421 | 359.03 | +3.59 |
| 1996 | 423 | 361.59 | +2.55 |
| 1997 | 422 | 362.33 | +0.75 |
| 1998 | 420 | 360.25 | −2.09 |
| 1999 | 420 | 361.18 | +0.94 |
| 2000 | 425 | 364.47 | +3.29 |
| 2001 | 427 | 366.86 | +2.39 |
| 2002 | 430 | 374.38 | +7.52 |
| 2003 | 427 | 376.11 | +1.72 |
| 2004 | 424 | 376.32 | +0.22 |
| 2005 | 426 | 378.94 | +2.62 |
| 2006 | 420 | 378.06 | −0.88 |
| 2007 | 423 | 380.56 | +2.50 |
| 2008 | 419 | 379.25 | −1.32 |
| 2009 | 416 | 376.57 | −2.68 |
| 2010 | 420 | 379.62 | +3.05 |
| 2011 | 412 | 371.11 | −8.51 |
| 2012 | 412 | 372.76 | +1.65 |
| 2013 | 409 | 370.34 | −2.42 |
| 2014 | 414 | 376.18 | +5.84 |
| 2015 | 415 | 380.26 | +4.08 |
| 2016 | 423 | 389.98 | +9.73 |
| 2017 | 423 | 391.49 | +1.51 |
| 2018 | 425 | 396.82 | +5.33 |
| 2019 | 417 | 392.87 | −3.94 |
| 2020 | 414 | 388.62 | −4.25 |
| 2021 | 411 | 387.62 | −1.00 |
| 2022 | 412 | 391.72 | +4.10 |
| 2023 | 416 | 394.46 | +2.74 |
| 2024 | 419 | 399.55 | +5.09 |
| 2025 | 414 | 398.56 | −0.99 |
| 2026 | 419 | 404.80 | +6.24 |
Only years in which capacity changed are listed.
Dates are the units' start-up and permanent-shutdown years in the August 2026 tracker release. 23 mothballed units are not drawn, because the record gives no date for when each went offline and a guess would show capacity the data does not support. Fusion devices, naval reactors and units under construction are excluded.
Sources
- Global Nuclear Power Tracker, Global Energy Monitor, August 2026 release , CC BY 4.0
- Base map: Natural Earth 110m land , public domain
How these sources are used, including the corrections applied on top of them and what is deliberately left blank · download the underlying data